<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adopting ASP.NET MVC: WebForms Damage Control</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joshua-arnold.com/2009/05/adopting-aspnet-mvc-webforms-damage-control/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joshua-arnold.com/2009/05/adopting-aspnet-mvc-webforms-damage-control/</link>
	<description>Random thoughts on software development, life, and the art of growing old.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 20:33:57 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Ross</title>
		<link>http://www.joshua-arnold.com/2009/05/adopting-aspnet-mvc-webforms-damage-control/comment-page-1/#comment-215</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 00:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joshua-arnold.com/?p=204#comment-215</guid>
		<description>Great articule. I had the same problem when I was learning MVC. I think the little that I learned from java server pages helped out a lot with my understanding. Even with that background it took me about a week of solid development with MVC for me to get a good grasp of it, but the technology is well worth it as mvc opens up all sorts javascript librarys that would be painful to use with webforms. The main benefit I feel is how easy it is to handle dynamic &#039;control&#039; creation on the clients side, which requires a lot of nasty code to work in webforms. 
Well, that&#039;s my two cents worth on MVC, I hope it helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great articule. I had the same problem when I was learning MVC. I think the little that I learned from java server pages helped out a lot with my understanding. Even with that background it took me about a week of solid development with MVC for me to get a good grasp of it, but the technology is well worth it as mvc opens up all sorts javascript librarys that would be painful to use with webforms. The main benefit I feel is how easy it is to handle dynamic &#8216;control&#8217; creation on the clients side, which requires a lot of nasty code to work in webforms.<br />
Well, that&#8217;s my two cents worth on MVC, I hope it helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
